Skip to content

MDL/Special Cases

Displaying 1-6 of 6 cases.


Pursuant to an order dated April 14, 2010, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated and transferred 12 actions from various courts throughout the United States to the District of Kansas. Plaintiffs in the consolidated proceedings allege that Bank of America is liable for unpaid wages and related penalties resulting from its alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") and similar state laws in California and Washington.... more »



Plaintiffs bring class action claims for damages and injunctive relief against motor fuel retailers in Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, the District of Columbia and Guam. Plaintiffs claim that because defendants sell... more »


Plaintiff brings an action asking a three-judge panel to declare as unconstitutional the current apportionment for congressional, state senate, state representative and Kansas board of education seats because they do not reflect the demographic shifts that are documented by the 2010 decennial census.  The Kansas legislature failed to reach agreement on boundaries for new districts.  Defendant agrees that continued use of the existing maps is unconstitutional... more »


According to the Transfer Order dated December 11, 2014 and filed in this Court on December 22, 2014: “These cases concern the Syngenta defendants’ decision to commercialize corn seeds containing a genetically modified trait, known as ‘MIR 162,’ that reportedly controls certain insects.  Corn with this trait has entered U.S. corn stocks but has not been approved for import by the Chinese government, which has imposed a complete ban on... more »


This multidistrict litigation (MDL) case includes class actions in which the plaintiffs claim the defendants engaged in unlawful price-fixing conspiracies with respect to urethane chemical products, in violation of the federal antitrust law. The Court has consolidated two sets of cases relating to different types of urethane products: the Polyester Polyol cases, which have been settled; and the Polyether Polyol cases, which have been settled against... more »